<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Palace Blog &#187; Brazil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/tag/brazil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Walking With Digital Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From Brazil vs Holland (1-2)</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/07/brazil-vs-holland/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=brazil-vs-holland</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/07/brazil-vs-holland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Chiles In Sensible Statement Shock I don&#8217;t normally bother to take any interest in what the ITV panel has to say as I&#8217;m quite capable of devising lukewarm footballing banalities myself, but one thing Chiles said struck home, &#8220;If you&#8217;ve got no discipline and you can&#8217;t defend set pieces, you aren&#8217;t going to stay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adrian Chiles In Sensible Statement Shock</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t normally bother to take any interest in what the ITV panel has to say as I&#8217;m quite capable of devising lukewarm footballing banalities myself, but one thing Chiles said struck home, &#8220;If you&#8217;ve got no discipline and you can&#8217;t defend set pieces, you aren&#8217;t going to stay in the World Cup&#8221;. Not the most complete dissection of the Brazilian team, but it cut to the chase and erased all the bullshit. He may never make such and authoritative, Hansonesque statement again in his hideous sofa-confined lifetime.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s All About The Basics</strong></p>
<p>Much as everyone would have liked it to be, this match wasn&#8217;t about flair, individual skill, touches of footballing genius, dribbling or total football. It was about what the FA Director of Coaching <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football-learning-to-live-with-footballs-bogeyman-dave-hadfield-lived-next-door-to-charles-hughes--and-survived-1376088.html" target="_blank">Charles Hughes</a> thought football was all about, few touches good, many touches bad. It was about the techniques of direct football rather than the artistic machinations of intricate interior passing. Brazil&#8217;s goal, like Germany&#8217;s first against Engerland was about a single, clinical pass through the middle to your frontman and catastrophic defensive play. Holland&#8217;s first was the result of the first genuinely dangerous cross into the box in open play, while their second was from one of only two genuinely effective corners.</p>
<p>Looking at the most effective and dangerous moments of play, these too conformed to Hughes&#8217; maxim. At the tail end of either half, both teams were playing an almost infectious kick and rush style of play as the ball was swiftly moved from one box to the other and back again. Unlike English football, where this is achieve by hoofing the ball over the midfield trenches, the movement here was mainly on the ground, the reason for the swift motion from one end to another was that both midfields had almost completely disappeared and there was a cavernous 30 yard gap surrounding the half-way line. This meant that Hughes&#8217; few touches principle worked beautifully. Conversely, once either defence had settled down to it&#8217;s organised 4 &#8211; 1 &#8211; 4 on the 18 yard line formation, there were no &#8216;few touches&#8217; moves to be made other than genuinely good crosses (which neither side could apparently deliver with any regularity), so the many touches, eye of a needle footwork needed to take prominence. The real key at this point was not number of touches, but speed of movement, both on and off the ball, and even then it didn&#8217;t conjure up very many serious chances.</p>
<p><strong>This Ball IS Shit</strong></p>
<p>So. Two of the best football playing and dead ball specialist sides and no one can take a free kick that is on target? I know it&#8217;s the whole bad workers blame their tools thing, but all of the best players bar the Japanese can&#8217;t be wrong. This ball doesn&#8217;t deviate and dip like others do and thus makes free kicks more difficult to take. This means not only do we not see as many free kick goals (total so far something like 3 and one of those was a mistake by the keeper and two of them were by Japan), but it becomes a much safer option for a defender to foul an attacker around the 18 yard line. Take the free kick, neutralise the attack, get the defense back in position. It&#8217;s a no brainer.</p>
<p><strong>57 Down 7 To Go 7 Teams Remaining</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/07/brazil-vs-holland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From Brazil vs Chile (3-0)</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/brazil-vs-chile/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=brazil-vs-chile</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/brazil-vs-chile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (But Not Mad Enough) So the fantastically deranged maddest side in the World Cup take on the most successful, most assured, most bloody excellent footballing nation in the world. And for the first half hour they held their own. Only Chile don&#8217;t know how to hold, they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (But Not Mad Enough)</strong></p>
<p>So the fantastically deranged maddest side in the World Cup take on the most successful, most assured, most bloody excellent footballing nation in the world. And for the first half hour they held their own. Only Chile don&#8217;t know how to hold, they don&#8217;t know how to defend, they barely know how to midfield. No, all that Chile know is how to attack. So that is what they did. I guess some wars were like this, wave after wave of devoted patriotic fighters launching themselves at the enemy with no thought of their own safety. Sadly the Brazilians have no sense of romance for things like this (plenty for all sorts of other things, but not this).</p>
<p>The Brazilians are like a seabreak, their defence extends from the halfway line and the wave upon wave of Chilean attacks ended up broken and diffused. They simply could not make any headway beyond the 18 yard line. No matter how mad the attack, how ambitious the movement, there was nothing they could do.</p>
<p>And then the Brazilians came. Last year in the Confederations Cup Brazil surprised everyone. Not because they won it, but because of the way they won it. Lots of set pieces, corners mainly. Headers. Not the sort of thing you normally associate with Brazil and the beautiful game, but somehow quite enticing. Anyway, they did it again. Juan scored from a corner, a  nice, well timed header. And then it was game on.</p>
<p>Because Dunga&#8217;s side don&#8217;t just embody the old skool Brazil, they epitomise the very best of the Mourinho Discipline. The tightest of defences, well not the tightest of defences, because they&#8217;ve conceded two goals, one of them to the North Koreans, the North Koreans eh, remember when we thought they might actually be worth a damn? Seems like a thousand years ago, but it was actually only last Tuesday week. But, in any case they run a pretty bloody tight defence. Tight enough that the mad, mad, mad, mad Chileans couldn&#8217;t get through it.</p>
<p>And as the Chileans tried, so the Brazillians just had to get back at them and started playing some neat football. Not so neat that you&#8217;d call it crazy samba football or anything, but neat nonetheless. Sort of Inter on a very, very good day. Nice.  But not that nice. That is coming later.</p>
<p><strong>54 Down 10 To Go 10 Teams Remaining</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/brazil-vs-chile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extra Extra What About Them Second Rounds Then</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-second-rounds/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=extra-extra-second-rounds</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-second-rounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraguay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uruguay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Group Of Ease Yeah, so one of Uruguay, South Korea, USA or Ghana is going to a World Cup semi-final. And, let&#8217;s face it, that should have been Engerland not USA in that list. Out of these I give the Koreans little or no chance, for while they have a great team with a couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Group Of Ease</strong></p>
<p>Yeah, so one of Uruguay, South Korea, USA or Ghana is going to a World Cup semi-final. And, let&#8217;s face it, that should have been Engerland not USA in that list. Out of these I give the Koreans little or no chance, for while they have a great team with a couple of decent players, they&#8217;re up against Uruguay, who have the excellent Diego Forlorn, who seems to be one of the very few players not to have been overwhelmed by the scale of the World Cup and has actually seized control of and dominated games. I see Uruguay going right the way through to the semi. USA have a great team with a never say die attitude, but attitude aside all they really have to offer is Landon Donovan and Clint Dempsey and I&#8217;m not convinced. Ghana are a great strong passing side, who haven&#8217;t managed to score goals other than penalties so far. You can see them riding the wave of African euphoria, but they&#8217;re going to have trouble when they come up against a quality side.</p>
<p><strong>Group Of Death</strong></p>
<p>Forget any previous pussy, lame Groups of Death, this is the real thing. Germany, Engerland, Argentina and, well there&#8217;s always one, Mexico. For Engerland to get to the semis, we&#8217;re going to have to beat both the Germans and the Argies. If we get that far life will be very sweet indeed and we&#8217;ll probably only have to beat Spain and Brazil to win the big lump of gold. So no pressure there boys. If we want to win it, we&#8217;re going to have to do it the hard way. Heart says we go through and win, rational analysis says it&#8217;ll be the bloody Argies (again).</p>
<p><strong>Group Of Football</strong></p>
<p>With both Holland and Brazil, this should be a group of total football. Holland, I suspect have been playing a very cagey game and not really over-exerting themselves. Straight wins throughout their First Round matches means that they haven&#8217;t really been tested yet and I don&#8217;t see the conquerors of Italy, Slovakia, giving them any trouble at all. I think the Dutch will open with their wingmen and then we&#8217;ll see some football. Brazil and Chile should play off a great South American cup tie, but given Chile&#8217;s attack only policy and Brazil&#8217;s excellent defence I see Brazil wiping the floor with Chile&#8217;s poor quality defending. Brazil v Holland will be a cracking quarter final, which will provide Brazil with a really serious test, but this Brazil side is pretty formidable and, like the Dutch, just beginning to find their form. I see this as Brazil&#8217;s group.</p>
<p><strong>Group Of Unexpected</strong></p>
<p>Ideally, Spain and Chile should have switched groups, but they didn&#8217;t so this group has the Tweedledumb and Tweedledumberer match up of Spain and Portugal, in some ways it hardly matters which one of them comes through. Spain will have a tough game, they seem to have lost their way mentally and don&#8217;t know which direction to go in. Now true World Cup Champions always undergo some kind of transformation during the tournament, but the transformation Spain are undergoing is tortuous. Will they sacrifice the beautiful game that got them here for a pragmatic hoof and wingplay game we saw them trying before Chile gifted them the game? Portugal will be a hard test, they have a rock solid defence and are really hard to play against and when they&#8217;re in flow as they were against North Korea, they can&#8217;t half knock in the goals. I see Portugal going through. Paraguay and Japan will be a fantastic, open game, the Japanese will not give in and Paraguay are a decent team. This match should be a cracker and I see Portugal going out of this group.</p>
<p><strong>The Semis</strong></p>
<p>I see these being</p>
<p>Uruguay vs Engerland</p>
<p>Brazil vs Portugal</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t help being optimistic eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-second-rounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From Group G Eliminators</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/group-g-eliminators/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=group-g-eliminators</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/group-g-eliminators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivory Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Group of Death My Arse &#8211; Brazil 0 &#8211; 0 Portugal When the Group of Death was originally announced, everyone thought that it would be the usual Group of Death malarkey, with teams rushing out of the blocks to inflict maximum pain on the small usually African or Asian nation unlucky enough to have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Group of Death My Arse &#8211; Brazil 0 &#8211; 0 Portugal</strong></p>
<p>When the Group of Death was originally announced, everyone thought that it would be the usual Group of Death malarkey, with teams rushing out of the blocks to inflict maximum pain on the small usually African or Asian nation unlucky enough to have been drawn with the three Big Boys. However, in this Group the only danger of death is of me dying of boredom, so vacuous and tepid was this encounter. Admittedly it wasn&#8217;t quite up to the thoroughly reprehensible standards set by the two most boring teams of all time Switzerland  and Ukraine in 2006 (and fuck me was that boring, by the end I was the only person left in the pub including the landlord), but it was way up to the standards set by the likes of Bolton, Blackburn, Hull etc. Quite how Brazil (Brazil for god&#8217;s sake) can be this unimaginative is a mystery, although they were without both Kaka, who was harshly sent off in their match with the Ivory Coast, and Elano, who wasn&#8217;t so much sent off as taken out of the game by the Ivorians. And, yes they were up against an extremely well-drilled Portuguese team, whose defensive record is pretty exemplary and whose version of the Mourinho Discipline is certainly a great deal more exciting than that of Switzerland. So you could say it was a stalemate of a game that was essentially a dead rubber to start with, the Portuguese destruction of North Korea meaning that Ivory Coast had to score approximately 10 to have any chance and still needed the Brazilians to beat the Portuguese. So, in some ways it was more predictable that this match should be a nil-nil than the Mexico Uruguay game. It&#8217;s just a shame that what could have been a classic turned into a turkey.</p>
<p><strong>Meanwhile In The North Korean House Of Pain &#8211; Ivory Coast 3 &#8211; 0 North Korea</strong></p>
<p>How disappointed are we in both these sorry excuses for teams. The North Koreans had the virtue of being an unknown quantity and were determined and plucky against Brazil, but then fell apart against Portugal, who could have spanked them for a hell of a lot more than the seven they put past them. Unfortunately for North Korea the tactics of unrestrained totalitarian dictatorship don&#8217;t translate very effectively from the gulag to the football pitch. Unfortunately for the Ivory Coast the joys of military dictatorship don&#8217;t inspire the best in a football team. You have to feel that this is probably the end of the road for the World Cup hopes of the Drog, the Toure brothers and the rest of this generation of Ivorians.</p>
<p><strong>So Bye-Bye North Korea And Ivory Coast</strong></p>
<p>For you, this was the group of death.</p>
<p><strong>46 Down 18 To Go 17 Teams Remaining</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/group-g-eliminators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extra Extra What We Learned At The Halfway Point</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-what-we-learned-at-the-halfway-point/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=extra-extra-what-we-learned-at-the-halfway-point</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-what-we-learned-at-the-halfway-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivory Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oztralia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraguay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uruguay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Competition Has Kicked Off Yes, the Second Round of Group matches were certainly better than the First Round. Most teams understood that they couldn&#8217;t simply defend all the time and play for a draw, even the Swiss, whose adoption of an almost &#8216;Neutral Country&#8217; option has seen them regularly top both the Haven&#8217;t Conceded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Competition Has Kicked Off</strong></p>
<p>Yes, the Second Round of Group matches were certainly better than the First Round. Most teams understood that they couldn&#8217;t simply defend all the time and play for a draw, even the Swiss, whose adoption of an almost &#8216;Neutral Country&#8217; option has seen them regularly top both the Haven&#8217;t Conceded and the Haven&#8217;t Scored tables, realised that at some point they&#8217;d have to come out and have a shot, although to be fair they did have something that vaguely resembled a shot in the First Round and it paid off handsomely. The games got faster and more meaningful as we saw Matches That Mattered and teams realised that there was a very real danger of their World Cup ending later this week.</p>
<p><strong>The Goals Are Coming</strong></p>
<p>As teams threw off the shackles of defensive cowardice and started attacking we began to see more goals. Few teams were content to sit on a one goal lead and continued to press their opponents. Some goals were even good, although few of them were up to the Tshabalala standard. However, I distinctly remember exclaiming, &#8220;What a goal&#8221; more than once during Round 2.</p>
<p><strong>The Cheating Has Started</strong></p>
<p>Grab and Dive, with or without pirouette, is the order of the day. Compulsive penalty box wrestling at every set piece. Not that much deliberate diving, but plenty of subtle blocking and writhing around. All in an attempt to cheat your way to a free kick or some colour of card for the opposition, or both. Not good. I think if it continues, we will see some kind of tv replay system introduced on the fly, if only because the whole world is watching.</p>
<p><strong>Lots of Empty Seats</strong></p>
<p>Now that it&#8217;s getting serious I suspect we won&#8217;t be seeing too many empty stadiums, but I&#8217;d lay money that there will be empty seats at the Uruguay Mexico match, where both teams need only to draw to go through (0 &#8211; 0 anyone?). However, too many venues have been conspicuously less than capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Who Has Been Naughty?</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s goodbye to South Africa, France (very naughty), Nigeria, Greece (very bad),  Algeria,  Oztralia (awful), Serbia (painful). Cameroon, New Zealand (rubbish), Slovakia (tedious), Ivory Coast (unlucky to get Group of Death for the second World Cup in a row), North Korea, and Honduras. You are all officially too crap for the World Cup. Book your flights now.</p>
<p><strong>Who Has Been Nice?</strong></p>
<p>And it&#8217;s hello to Mexico, Uruguay, Argentina, South Korea, Ghana, Germany, Holland, Paraguay, Italy, Brazil, Portugal, and Chile. Nicely done South America.</p>
<p><strong>And Who Is Bricking It?</strong></p>
<p>Group C is totally up for grabs with two of Engerland, USA and Slovenia, the permutations are excruciating, but basically all teams have to win to be sure that they will qualify. In Group E Japan and Denmark will duke it out, a draw being enough to take the Japanese through. Group H is so complicated that Spain, Chile and Switzerland could all end up with 6 points and theoretically identical goal differences and goals scored, in which case as Spain will have beaten Chile, who have beaten Switzerland, who have beaten Spain lots would have to be drawn.  Makes penalty shoot outs seem tame by comparison.</p>
<p><strong>And Who Is Really Bricking It Most?</strong></p>
<p>Has to be ever-optimistic no-hopers Engerland, who just seem utterly unable to cope with the pressure of having to play a few matches away from home in front of large television audiences. Basking in unwarrented media acclaim and with performances getting more inadequate by the day, Engerland are a disaster waiting to happen. And while the French are imploding with a farcical degree of hilarity, Engerland can&#8217;t even manage an effective internal coup d&#8217;etat. One thing is clear, Wednesday could be the most excruciating game of football ever played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/extra-extra-what-we-learned-at-the-halfway-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From Brazil vs Ivory Coast (3-1)</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-ivory-coast-3-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-ivory-coast-3-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-ivory-coast-3-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivory Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ivory Coast Are The New Croatia It&#8217;s now well accepted that Slaven Bilic&#8217;s dive to get Lauren Blanc sent off in the 1998 semi-final was the most cynical bit of cheating in recent World Cups. However, the bit of Ivory Coast cheating to get Kaka sent off in this match has elevated cheating to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ivory Coast Are The New Croatia</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s now well accepted that Slaven Bilic&#8217;s dive to get Lauren Blanc sent off in the 1998 semi-final was the most cynical bit of cheating in recent World Cups. However, the bit of Ivory Coast cheating to get Kaka sent off in this match has elevated cheating to a new high. Keita, who dumped himself to the floor having run into Kaka, has effectively lied to the entire planet and cheated his way into the record books. Like Croatia, let&#8217;s now hope that Ivory Coast get everything they so richly deserve and are consummately dumped out of this competition. You could argue that Keita is merely aping the floppy diving style of renowned primadonna Diveba, whose writhing on the floor is legendary, but it&#8217;s not acceptable here.</p>
<p><strong>Brazil Are Beginning To Turn It On, Ivory Coast Turn It Off<br />
</strong></p>
<p>3 &#8211; 0 up and Brazil start to play some nice little passing things, but they were given a bit of licence in that Ivory Coast failed to play the Mourinho Discipline. You have to suspect that, like most of the African teams here, they don&#8217;t have the inclination or the managerial instruction to do this. You would have thought that a team that boasted both Toure bothers and Zakora would have the nous to be able to play a more accomplished defence (or indeed a more adventurous attack). I recall the Ivory Coast from the last World Cup and they were just a fantastic dynamic attacking side, whose progress was only impeded by being in the Group of Death with Holland and Argentina. This World Cup, in addition to giving them the kind of draw that would make you feel that FIFA is against you, has seen them become less adventurous, interesting and turned them to the dark side of football.</p>
<p><strong>Brazil Are Going To Explode</strong></p>
<p>And not just in a footballing sense. They will be a bit grumpy about Kaka&#8217;s sending off and will be pretty insistent that FIFA rescind it. In some ways it doesn&#8217;t matter, Kaka will only be suspended for one game and Brazil have all but qualified &#8211; their match against Portugal is something of a formality. But you would like to see some kind of justice done. Also it is an indication of the pressure that the refs are going to come under in the latter stages of the tournament, where grabbing and manhandling in the box are likely to be rife and every incident is going to be viewed from multiple camera angles in high definition. It will only take one really bad decision for FIFA to be getting out the video replay machines.</p>
<p><strong>29 Down 35 To Go 31 Teams Remaining</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-ivory-coast-3-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Learned From Brazil vs North Korea (2-1)</title>
		<link>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-north-korea-2-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-north-korea-2-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-north-korea-2-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve Got To Be Fast What with everyone and their uncle taking their cue from the Little Red Book of Mourinho and Allerdyce (2 banks of four, midfield holding player, 10 men minimum behind the ball in the final third as soon as you lose possession, blah, blah, blah), there really is only one way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You&#8217;ve Got To Be Fast</strong></p>
<p>What with everyone and their uncle taking their cue from the Little Red Book of Mourinho and Allerdyce (2 banks of four, midfield holding player, 10 men minimum behind the ball in the final third as soon as you lose possession, blah, blah, blah), there really is only one way to break teams down. That is to own the transition between gaining possession and scoring, the incendiary moments before the opposition can get their shit together. That means you have to break fast, move fast, pass fast, confuse the opposition and score. It means pretty constant movement off the ball to show yourself to your teammates and pull the defence out of position to create openings. Think of the way Man U, Aresenal and Chelsea can break from defence to goalscoring  in 5 &#8211; 10 seconds and the power, pace, accuracy and style that requires. So far no team here has shown they are capable of or even aspire to this quality of football to any significant degree. After the German&#8217;s demolition of Oztralia, this was the second best match so far.</p>
<p><strong>What A Goal!</strong></p>
<p>And when you do it right, it is awesome. For the first (only) time in the entire game we saw a Brazillian attacking the Koreans at speed and a nice direction changing pass from Elano to Maicon (second only to Robinho&#8217;s pass to Elano for the second goal). This provided the clear space for Maicon to shoot. And goals win games. Once you&#8217;re ahead, it&#8217;s a completely different match as the opposition has to chase the game and opens up their tightly maxed out defence. Now we&#8217;ve not seen many good goals so far, the killer strike of Tshabalala with the fantastic defence splitting pass setting it up being the pick of the moments to date, but this eclipsed even that. Killer strike.</p>
<p><strong>Kudos To The Koreans &#8211; They Have Balls Of Steel<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Unlike many of the low grade, whining, fouling, lazy, pig-dog ugly teams we&#8217;ve seen so far (Oztralia, Slovenia, Algeria, New Zealand, Slovakia, Denmark, Paraguay, and the whole of Group A hang your fucking heads in shame), the Koreans haven&#8217;t flinched, fouled or played the crying showpony. Nor have they simply shut up shop like some qualitiless, lower league Fat Sam Allerdyce team. Instead they defended effectively, attacked when they had the ball and never let up. If only they didn&#8217;t live in a place ruined by a fucked up, four-eyed moron and his spastic cadres, they might have  a fully fledged country by now. In any other group they would have a very real chance of getting into the knock out phase. Portugal and Ivory Coast think all they need to do is beat these guys and rack up the goals. After seeing their lacklustre game earlier I think both those teams should be very, very worried. This is, indeed, the Group of Death. The next round of matches is going to be fantastic, especially Portugal vs North Korea. I can see the table reading, Brazil 6, North Korea 3, Ivory Coast 1, Portugal 1. And then it really is Game On.</p>
<p><strong>14 Down 50 To Go</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palace.co.uk/blog/2010/06/what-we-learned-from-brazil-vs-north-korea-2-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

